Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of a rearward center of gravity (CG)?

A rearward center of gravity (CG) typically results in a configuration that is less stable than a forward CG. As CG moves aft, the aircraft may exhibit increased difficulty in controlling pitch, leading to a tendency for the aircraft to "mush" or stall more easily, and requiring more pilot input to maintain stable flight.

In contrast, a forward CG generally contributes to more stability, as the weight distribution helps maintain a nose-down attitude, making the aircraft less sensitive to pitch changes. In terms of flight performance, an aft CG usually causes the aircraft to fly at higher speeds due to the reduced aerodynamic drag on the tail, but it requires careful handling to manage the associated stability issues.

In terms of trim, pilots may find that an aft CG requires more trim adjustments to counteract the pitch changes that occur during flight, rather than less. Thus, the idea that a rearward CG is more stable does not align with the aerodynamic principles concerned; rather, it embodies the opposite characteristic.